و لقد صدقناه فيما هو أعظم من هذا .
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
إخوتي الأحبة لقد طلب مني أخ أحمدي عراقي جزاه الله خيرا أن اثبت من مراجع طبية صدق قول المسيح في امكانية حدوث حمل اثناء الحمل و في امكانية استمرار الحمل لأكثر من سنتين و في التولد العذري . و هي بالترتيب سوبرفيتاشن و ليثوبيديون و بارثينوجينيسز .
Superfetation and Lithopedion or stone baby and Parthenogenesis .
و ذلك بحكم تخصصي كأخصائي جراحة عامة و جراحات أطفال و عيوب خلقية . فقلت له و الله إن كان قد قالها المسيح الموعود فقد صدق لأننا صدقناه فيما هو أعظم من ذلك و هو الوحي و لقد وجدنا بركات صدقه و دلائلها و بركات الإيمان به التي تحيي الموتى فأحيانا . أما و إن كان الخبثاء مكذبي المسيح لا يؤمنون فأسرد لكم الآن هذه المقالة العلمية الدالة على صدق الظواهر الثلاث السابقة و الحمد لله رب العالمين .
ففي الجزء الأول من المقالة تحدثت عن ظاهرة السوبرفيتاشن اللتي يحدث فيها حمل على حمل و بينت بالأدلة و المراجع و الاقتباسات المعزوة امكانية حدوث ذلك بشكل نادر في البشر في حالات الرحم المزدوج و كذلك في حالات احادية الرحم حيث يكون الحمل الثاني ضعيف نسبيا مقارنة بالحمل الاول و امكانية استمراره بعد الولادة على قيد الحياة تحت ظروف خاصة .
و في الجزء الثاني من المقالة جلبت مقتبسات عن ظاهرة الليثوبيديون و هو استمرار الحمل لاكثر من سنتين و غالبا ما يكون هناك اتصال بين الرحم و تجويف البطن و غالبا ما يكون الجنين محنطا و لقد كانت زوجتي شاهدة على اكثر من حالة من هذا القبيل و الله على ما اقول شهيد و لقد حدثتني بذلك قبل ان اعلم ان المسيح الموعود قد اشار الى امكانية حدوث ذلك . اما إذا ثبتت امكانية كمون البويضة المخصبة في قناة فالوب لاكثر من سنتين ثم خروجها عن كمونها و استعدادها للانزراع في الرحم ليتم حمل كامل فهو دليل اخر على صدق اشارات المسيح الموعود المؤيدة بالروح القدس . سبحان الله !!!!!!!!!!!!!
و في الجزء الثالث من المقالة جلبت تقرير مجلة علمية بريطانية تشير الى ظاهرة التولد العذري بالاضافة الى تفسير تولد الذكر الولد من الانثى بشكل مثير للدهشة رغم كونها لا تحمل الكروموسوم Y المظهر للصفات الذكرية لعدم وجوده أصلا او لكمونه و الله من وراء القصد .
//////////////////////
Superfetation
.
==================
Superfetation (also spelledsuperfoetation ) is the simultaneous occurrence of more than one stage of developing offspring in the same animal. In mammals, it manifests as the formation of an embryo from a different estrous cycle while another embryo or fetus is already present in the uterus. When two separate instances of fertilisation occur during the same menstrual cycle, it is known as superfecundation.
Superfetation is claimed to be common in some species of animals, but is extremely rare in humans. In mammals, it can occur only where there are two uteri, or where the estrous cycle continues through pregnancy. The risk with superfetation in humans is that the second baby is often born prematurely, which can increase its odds of experiencing lung development problems.[1]
In animals
Animals that have been claimed to be subject to superfetation include rodents (mice and rats), rabbits, horse, sheep, marsupials (kangaroos and sugar gliders), and primates (humans). Superfetation has also been clearly demonstrated and is normal for some species of poeciliid fishes.[2]
In humans
Reports of superfetation occurring long after the first impregnation have often been treated with suspicion, and some have been clearly discredited. Other explanations have been given (and demonstrated) for different levels of development between twins. Artificially induced superfetation has, however, been demonstrated, although only up to a short period after insemination.
In 1960, John and Mary Tress of Baltimore MD had what the nurse mistakenly identified as twins. Dr Paul C Weinberg of Mt. Sinai hospital delivered the boys, Anthony John and Mark Francis, and realized that Anthony, born five minutes before his brother Mark, looked premature. Immediately, Dr Weinberg did X-rays of the boys' thigh bones and noticed a disparity in bone age. Anthony was a two-month premature baby born five minutes before his full-term brother Mark. Anthony was conceived a full two months after his brother Mark.[3]
In 2007, Ame and Lia Herrity, conceived three weeks apart, were born in the United Kingdom to Amelia Spence and George Herrity.[4]
In May 2007, Harriet and Thomas Mullineux, also conceived three weeks apart, were born in Benfleet, Essex, to Charlotte and Matt Mullineux.[5]
In 2009, Todd and Julia Grovenburg of Fort Smith, Arkansas, received international media attention for Mrs. Grovenburg's conception of an additional child while already pregnant with a child conceived two and a half weeks earlier. If it were possible to carry both children to term, the birth of the first child would be expected in December 2009, whereas the second child would be due in January 2010.[6][7] Grovenburg's obstetrician reported that cases of superfetation "can only be confirmed after delivery by chromosomal and metabolic studies on the baby."[8] Both healthy babies were delivered through Caesarean section on 2 December 2009.[9]
References
1.
• Jacob, Stephanie (September 2009). "Superfetation Double Pregnancy". AOL Health. Retrieved September 2009. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
• • FishBase's glossary
• • Newsweek Magazine, 31 July. 1961
• • "Mother Deliveries Babies Minutes Apart but They are Not Twins!", Medindia, 1 October 2007.
• • Hale, Beth. "The babies born just a minute apart who AREN'T twins", The Daily Mail, Associated Newspapers, Ltd., 15 January 2008.
• • ABC News: Arkansas Pregnant Woman Is Pregnant Again.
• • Allen, Nick. "Pregnant woman conceives second child", The Daily Telegraph, 24 September 2009.
• • Jacob, Stephanie (September 2009). "Superfetation Double Pregnancy". AOL Health. Retrieved September 2009. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
• van Sipma, Ashley (1 July 2011). "I got pregnant while I was already pregnant! Woman gives birth to two babies on the same day but they are NOT twins". MailOnline. MailOnline. Archived from the original on 1 November 2011. Retrieved 1 November 2011.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Lithopedion
==================
A lithopedion. This highly
unusual specimen remained in the abdomen of a woman for 55 years. During this time the mother had five additional uncomplicated pregnancies.
A lithopedion – also spelled lithopaedion or lithopædion – (Ancient Greek: λίθος = stone; Ancient Greek: παιδίον = small child, infant), or stone baby, is a rare phenomenon which occurs most commonly when a fetus dies during an abdominal pregnancy,[1] is too large to be reabsorbed by the body, and calcifies on the outside as part of a maternal foreign body reaction, shielding the mother's body from the dead tissue of the fetus and preventing infection.
Lithopedia may occur from 14 weeks gestation to full term. It is not unusual for a stone baby to remain undiagnosed for decades, and it is often not until a patient is examined for other conditions or a proper examination is conducted that includes an X-ray, that a stone baby is found.
The condition was first described in a treatise by the physician Abū al-Qāsim (Abulcasis) in the 10th century, but fewer than 300 cases have been noted in 400 years of medical literature. The earliest lithopedion is one found in an archaeological excavation at Bering Sinkhole, on the Edwards Plateau in Kerr County, Texas dated to 1100 BC.[2] Another early example was found in a Gallo-Roman archaeological site in Costebelle, southern France, dating to the 4th century.[3]
In 1880, German physician Friedrich Küchenmeister reviewed 47 cases of lithopedia from the medical literature and identified three subgroups: Lithokelyphos ("Stone Sheath"), where calcification occurs on the placental membrane and not the fetus; Lithotecnon ("Stone Child") or "true" lithopedion, where the fetus itself is calcified after entering the abdominal cavity, following the rupture of the placental and ovarian membranes; and Lithokelyphopedion ("Stone Sheath [and] Child"), where both fetus and sac are calcified. Lithopedia can originate both as tubal or ovarian pregnancies.[4]
1• Perper, J.A. (2006): Chapter III: Time of Death and Changes after Death. Part 1: Anatomical Considerations. In: Spitz, W.U. & Spitz, D.J. (eds): Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death. Guideline for the Application of Pathology to Crime Investigations (Fourth edition), Charles C. Thomas, pp.: 87-127; Springfield, Illinois.
•2 • Rothschild BM, Rothschild C, Bement LC; Rothschild; Bement (July 1993). "Three-millennium antiquity of the lithokelyphos variety of lithopedion". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 169 (1): 140–1. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90148-c. PMID 8333440.
• 3• Wednesday Wonders #3: The Lithopedion
• 4 Bondenson, Jan (2000) The Two-headed Boy, and Other Medical Marvels. Cornell University, pgs. 39-41
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Parthenogenesis ( Virgin
Pregnancy )
===================
In 2009, a long-term study of reproductive health and published in the British Medical Journal, revealed that one in two hundred U.S. women said they have given birth without ever having had sexual intercourse. The study was based on the examination of 7,870 women and girls aged 15 to 28 from 1995 to 2009. 45 (0.5%) reported what is labeled a "virgin pregnancy, "unrelated to the use of assisted reproductive technology." Meaning they had no vaginal intercourse or in-vitro fertilisation (IVF).
According to a 1995 report by the University of Edinburgh, Human Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK that was released in the journal Nature Genetics; The magazine Slate reported in 2007:
"Where they demonstrate that parthenogenetic chimaerism can indeed result in viable human offspring, and suggest possible mechanisms of origin for this presumably rare event.
In their study, they write about a mother who brought her infant boy to the doctor after noticing that his head was developing abnormally. When doctors analyzed his blood, they found something truly bizarre: Despite his anatomically male features, the boy's blood cells were entirely female, consisting only of genetic material from his mother. Some of his other cells—such as those found in his urine—were normal, consisting of a combination of both maternal and paternal DNA.
Dr. Aarathi Prasad questions Mary’s virgin pregnancy in The Guardian. She points out one major problem with Jesus’s lack of paternity: that Jesus was male, presumably with an X and a Y chromosome. Since human females have only X chromosomes, there would be no way for Jesus to acquire his Y from Mary. Unless…
After speaking with some geneticists, Prasad presents one “implausible possibility”:
…Mary may have had a condition called testicular feminisation. Women with this condition have an X and a Y chromosome like a man, but their X chromosome carries a mutation that makes their bodies insensitive to testosterone. This leads to their developing as a female.
Genetically male, and probably sporting ambiguous genitals, Mary would have been sterile. But had she become pregnant spontaneously, her child could have inherited an intact Y chromosome."
Or quite possibly she carried a male worm with Y-DNA that impregnated her?
Scientists Induce Virgin Births in Humans
On August 2, 2007, after much independent investigation, it was revealed that discredited South Korean scientist Hwang Woo-Suk unknowingly produced the first human embryos resulting from parthenogenesis. Initially, Hwang claimed he and his team had extracted stem cells from cloned human embryos, a result later found to be fabricated. Further examination of the chromosomes of these cells show indicators of parthenogenesis in those extracted stem cells, similar to those found in the mice created by Tokyo scientists in 2004.
Although Hwang deceived the world about being the first to create artificially cloned human embryos, he did contribute a major breakthrough to stem cell research by creating human embryos using parthenogenesis. The truth was discovered in 2007, long after the embryos were created by him and his team in February 2004. This made Hwang the first, unknowingly, to successfully perform the process of parthenogenesis to create a human embryon and, ultimately, a human parthenogenetic stem cell line.
Dr Mohamed Rabie , Egypt .
1